I’ve read some speculation recently about why Windows Phone 7 hasn’t been more successful. (For example, here by Charlie Kindel and here by MG Siegler.) But they don’t seem to mention the Obvious Reason.
The Obvious Reason
Above, left: an exciting, vibrant, joyful-looking phone with appealing pictures on the front.
Above, right: a grey object ruefully displaying a handful of murky green squares.
Microsoft have missed any opportunity they might have had to compete directly against the iPhone for consumers’ attention. Besides getting in first and making a compelling product, Apple have spent a decade building what turns out to be a very effective means of selling phones to people — by actually showing them to people and letting people try them — without asking anyone to deal with the horror of the mobile phone shop. Microsoft haven’t got that option.
No, the competition for Windows Phone is Android, not iPhone. WP7 has to compete against Android on the shop floor, on the wall of plastic replicas, in the hearts and minds of mobile phone salespeople.
And it can’t do that, because it looks dull.
Why would anyone buy a phone that looked boring, but that was in fact the unusual, hazardous choice? Who wouldn’t rather get the phone that looks exciting, especially when it is also, underneath the facade, the popular and safe choice?
Windows Phone 7 is a lovely operating system to use; like many people I really appreciate its design, and I imagine that most people who do use it will enjoy it.
It emphasises information over decoration; creatively uses text itself as a responsive, dynamic interface element; and is as close as a mainstream OS has come to finding a successful replacement for every letter of the previous generation’s WIMP acronym.
WP7 exhibits “good taste” in a way that no other current operating system does. I use the term “good taste” in a rather loaded way. Apple show good judgement, but that’s not the same thing: when it comes to taste, Apple are always willing to exploit the appeal of the toylike, shiny, luxurious. WP7 resembles minimalist architecture in comparison.
Unfortunately for Microsoft, minimalist architecture isn’t very popular.
WP7 might have been designed to appeal to people like me, long-standing technology users for whom the thought of another shiny glass-look 3D-effect icon is a tiring one.
I like it for that. But for me to like something… let’s just say it’s not a good indicator of commercial success. The products I like best largely seem to flop, and I suspect many people whose interest in products is broadly technical find the same thing.
Does the fact that I like WP7 mean that it’s doomed, or does the fact that I think it may be doomed mean that it could take off after all? I’ll have to wait and see.